(push-mark))
(c-save-buffer-state
- (beginning-of-defun-function end-of-defun-function
+ (beginning-of-defun-function
+ end-of-defun-function
(start (point))
- (paren-state (copy-tree (c-parse-state))) ; This must not share list
- ; structure with other users of c-state-cache.
+ (paren-state (c-parse-state))
(orig-point-min (point-min)) (orig-point-max (point-max))
- lim ; Position of { which has been widened to.
+ lim ; Position of { which has been widened to.
where pos case-fold-search)
(save-restriction
;; Move back out of any macro/comment/string we happen to be in.
(c-beginning-of-macro)
- (setq pos (c-literal-limits))
- (if pos (goto-char (car pos)))
+ (setq pos (c-literal-start))
+ (if pos (goto-char pos))
(setq where (c-where-wrt-brace-construct))
(push-mark))
(c-save-buffer-state
- (beginning-of-defun-function end-of-defun-function
+ (beginning-of-defun-function
+ end-of-defun-function
(start (point))
- (paren-state (copy-tree (c-parse-state))) ; This must not share list
- ; structure with other users of c-state-cache.
+ (paren-state (c-parse-state))
(orig-point-min (point-min)) (orig-point-max (point-max))
lim
where pos case-fold-search)
;; Move back out of any macro/comment/string we happen to be in.
(c-beginning-of-macro)
- (setq pos (c-literal-limits))
- (if pos (goto-char (car pos)))
+ (setq pos (c-literal-start))
+ (if pos (goto-char pos))
(setq where (c-where-wrt-brace-construct))
;; Do we need to move forward from the brace to the semicolon?
(when (eq arg 0)
- (if (c-in-function-trailer-p) ; after "}" of struct/enum, etc.
+ (if (c-in-function-trailer-p) ; after "}" of struct/enum, etc.
(c-syntactic-re-search-forward ";"))
(setq pos (point))
(save-excursion
;; Move back out of any macro/comment/string we happen to be in.
(c-beginning-of-macro)
- (setq pos (c-literal-limits))
- (if pos (goto-char (car pos)))
+ (setq pos (c-literal-start))
+ (if pos (goto-char pos))
(setq where (c-where-wrt-brace-construct))
(or (save-restriction
(c-narrow-to-most-enclosing-decl-block nil)
- ;; Note: Some code duplication in `c-beginning-of-defun' and
- ;; `c-end-of-defun'.
- (catch 'exit
- (let ((start (point))
- (paren-state (c-parse-state))
- lim pos end-pos)
- (unless (c-safe
- (goto-char (c-least-enclosing-brace paren-state))
+ ;; Note: Some code duplication in `c-beginning-of-defun' and
+ ;; `c-end-of-defun'.
+ (catch 'exit
+ (let ((start (point))
+ (paren-state (c-parse-state))
+ lim pos end-pos)
+ (unless (c-safe
+ (goto-char (c-least-enclosing-brace paren-state))
;; If we moved to the outermost enclosing paren
;; then we can use c-safe-position to set the
;; limit. Can't do that otherwise since the
;; earlier paren pair on paren-state might very
;; well be part of the declaration we should go
;; to.
- (setq lim (c-safe-position (point) paren-state))
- t)
- ;; At top level. Make sure we aren't inside a literal.
- (setq pos (c-literal-limits
- (c-safe-position (point) paren-state)))
- (if pos (goto-char (car pos))))
-
- (when (c-beginning-of-macro)
- (throw 'exit
- (cons (point)
- (save-excursion
- (c-end-of-macro)
- (forward-line 1)
- (point)))))
-
- (setq pos (point))
- (when (or (eq (car (c-beginning-of-decl-1 lim)) 'previous)
- (= pos (point)))
- ;; We moved back over the previous defun. Skip to the next
- ;; one. Not using c-forward-syntactic-ws here since we
- ;; should not skip a macro. We can also be directly after
- ;; the block in a `c-opt-block-decls-with-vars-key'
- ;; declaration, but then we won't move significantly far
- ;; here.
- (goto-char pos)
- (c-forward-comments)
-
- (when (and near (c-beginning-of-macro))
- (throw 'exit
- (cons (point)
- (save-excursion
- (c-end-of-macro)
- (forward-line 1)
- (point))))))
-
- (if (eobp) (throw 'exit nil))
-
- ;; Check if `c-beginning-of-decl-1' put us after the block in a
- ;; declaration that doesn't end there. We're searching back and
- ;; forth over the block here, which can be expensive.
- (setq pos (point))
- (if (and c-opt-block-decls-with-vars-key
- (progn
- (c-backward-syntactic-ws)
- (eq (char-before) ?}))
- (eq (car (c-beginning-of-decl-1))
- 'previous)
- (save-excursion
- (c-end-of-decl-1)
- (and (> (point) pos)
- (setq end-pos (point)))))
- nil
- (goto-char pos))
-
- (if (and (not near) (> (point) start))
- nil
+ (setq lim (c-safe-position (point) paren-state))
+ t)
+ ;; At top level. Make sure we aren't inside a literal.
+ (setq pos (c-literal-start
+ (c-safe-position (point) paren-state)))
+ (if pos (goto-char pos)))
+
+ (when (c-beginning-of-macro)
+ (throw 'exit
+ (cons (point)
+ (save-excursion
+ (c-end-of-macro)
+ (forward-line 1)
+ (point)))))
- ;; Try to be line oriented; position the limits at the
- ;; closest preceding boi, and after the next newline, that
- ;; isn't inside a comment, but if we hit a neighboring
- ;; declaration then we instead use the exact declaration
- ;; limit in that direction.
- (cons (progn
(setq pos (point))
- (while (and (/= (point) (c-point 'boi))
- (c-backward-single-comment)))
- (if (/= (point) (c-point 'boi))
- pos
- (point)))
- (progn
- (if end-pos
- (goto-char end-pos)
- (c-end-of-decl-1))
+ (when (or (eq (car (c-beginning-of-decl-1 lim)) 'previous)
+ (= pos (point)))
+ ;; We moved back over the previous defun. Skip to the next
+ ;; one. Not using c-forward-syntactic-ws here since we
+ ;; should not skip a macro. We can also be directly after
+ ;; the block in a `c-opt-block-decls-with-vars-key'
+ ;; declaration, but then we won't move significantly far
+ ;; here.
+ (goto-char pos)
+ (c-forward-comments)
+
+ (when (and near (c-beginning-of-macro))
+ (throw 'exit
+ (cons (point)
+ (save-excursion
+ (c-end-of-macro)
+ (forward-line 1)
+ (point))))))
+
+ (if (eobp) (throw 'exit nil))
+
+ ;; Check if `c-beginning-of-decl-1' put us after the block in a
+ ;; declaration that doesn't end there. We're searching back and
+ ;; forth over the block here, which can be expensive.
(setq pos (point))
- (while (and (not (bolp))
- (not (looking-at "\\s *$"))
- (c-forward-single-comment)))
- (cond ((bolp)
- (point))
- ((looking-at "\\s *$")
- (forward-line 1)
- (point))
- (t
+ (if (and c-opt-block-decls-with-vars-key
+ (progn
+ (c-backward-syntactic-ws)
+ (eq (char-before) ?}))
+ (eq (car (c-beginning-of-decl-1))
+ 'previous)
+ (save-excursion
+ (c-end-of-decl-1)
+ (and (> (point) pos)
+ (setq end-pos (point)))))
+ nil
+ (goto-char pos))
+
+ (if (and (not near) (> (point) start))
+ nil
+
+ ;; Try to be line oriented; position the limits at the
+ ;; closest preceding boi, and after the next newline, that
+ ;; isn't inside a comment, but if we hit a neighboring
+ ;; declaration then we instead use the exact declaration
+ ;; limit in that direction.
+ (cons (progn
+ (setq pos (point))
+ (while (and (/= (point) (c-point 'boi))
+ (c-backward-single-comment)))
+ (if (/= (point) (c-point 'boi))
+ pos
+ (point)))
+ (progn
+ (if end-pos
+ (goto-char end-pos)
+ (c-end-of-decl-1))
+ (setq pos (point))
+ (while (and (not (bolp))
+ (not (looking-at "\\s *$"))
+ (c-forward-single-comment)))
+ (cond ((bolp)
+ (point))
+ ((looking-at "\\s *$")
+ (forward-line 1)
+ (point))
+ (t
pos))))))))
(and (not near)
(goto-char (point-min))