(Digression concerning error): Fix typo.

diff --git a/lispintro/ChangeLog b/lispintro/ChangeLog
index 753aec71d80e0062d673bb946714815ea2f492be..731e734f78cc5a9d0cc6af45d041c126ec00b92f 100644 (file)
--- a/lispintro/ChangeLog
+++ b/lispintro/ChangeLog
@@ -1,3 +1,7 @@
+2006-05-19  Thien-Thi Nguyen  <ttn@gnu.org>
+
+       * emacs-lisp-intro.texi (Digression concerning error): Fix typo.
+
 2005-09-16  Romain Francoise  <romain@orebokech.com>
 
        * emacs-lisp-intro.texi (GNU Free Documentation License):

diff --git a/lispintro/emacs-lisp-intro.texi b/lispintro/emacs-lisp-intro.texi
index c7fef17061fb7fafe42443fed6701049bcba22be..f941f3e44bada7e29c49b1b8894a34b52f507ef0 100644 (file)
--- a/lispintro/emacs-lisp-intro.texi
+++ b/lispintro/emacs-lisp-intro.texi
@@ -18278,7 +18278,7 @@ But a human expects to attempt this sort of thing, if only to find out
 whether the kill ring is full or empty.  This is an act of
 exploration.
 
-(From the human point of view, the act of exploration and discovery is
+From the human point of view, the act of exploration and discovery is
 not necessarily an error, and therefore should not be labelled as one,
 even in the bowels of a computer.  As it is, the code in Emacs implies
 that a human who is acting virtuously, by exploring his or her